托福考試獨立寫作范文:工作類題材 這次托福考試寫作部分整體難度適中。其中,綜合寫作考查生態環境類,整體難度適中,生僻詞匯較少。獨立寫作考查工作類話題,難度適中,學生如果準備過相關工作類素材的話整體難度不大。

獨立寫作
話題分類工作類
考題回憶Which of the following is the best additional way for employers to know more about applicants after interviews:
1.contact their previous employers
2.search their social media
3.give them one-month probation period
解題思路寫作思路:
要點:三選一的題目,可以褒一貶二,注意題目當中有限定詞best,所以在論證的時候注意程度,選擇一個論證好處,同時對其它兩個進行反駁。
觀點:認為give them one-month probation period是最好的方法
1.give them one-month probation的好處
(1)相比其它兩個選擇,能夠提供更加真實的工作情境來檢驗應聘者
(2)同時提供更多的時間來測試應聘者
2. contact their previous employers的壞處
(1)之前的老板可能因為和這個員工的關系好只說好話隱瞞缺點,或者反之;
(2)有些公司規模很大,老板不大可能了解所有的員工,得到的信息不全面也不準確。
3. search their social media的壞處
(1)呈現在社交平臺上的信息是不全面的,可能不能了解到工作方面的技能;
(2)也有可能是美化過的,不真實。
參考范文范文:
Hiring someone is a time-consuming process, and in order to find appropriate employees, these days many employers would also choose some additional ways to know more about applicants after interviews. My view is that while contacting the applicants’ previous employers and searching their social media seem like good options, giving them one-month probation period is the best additional method.
For newly recruited workers, one-month probation can be a trial period, which could provide more realistic working situations and offer more time to test these applicants. In most cases, the interviews could last for only few hours, so the information obtained from the interviews is not accurate and sufficient. According to a recent survey, 81% of individuals polled admitted to lying in interviews in order to get the job, while another survey from the Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) found that nearly one in five employers discovered candidates had given fraudulent references. As a result, it is not possible for employers to completely know applicants until they have actually started working for them. Even if the applicants do not lie, one-month probation can also provide more time for the employers to know if their future employees have the skills and abilities they expect. Personal statement in interviews is not absolutely reliable. Instead, only real working experience can test if they can well qualified for their applied positions.
For contacting the applicants’ previous employers and searching their social media, they not only cannot provide the benefits mentioned above, but also have other problems. If the HR manager contacts the previous company, the employer probably would only tell the merits and conceal the weaknesses of the applicant only because of their good working relationship and vice versa. In some large enterprises, it is highly possible that the employer even does not know every employee, so the information gained from this way is not accurate at all. Social media, such as online profile and social platform, also cannot tell the truth. For instance, a travelling photo or a video of doing sports is only a fragment of life, so other personal abilities or work-related skills cannot be fully revealed in these media. Even worse, many people only choose not to show their own flaws on these social platforms, through which it is extremely difficult for the employers to get to know their candidates.
To sum up, after interviews, compared with contacting applicants’ previous employers and searching their social media, giving applicants one-month probation period is the most effective and reliable way for employers to know more about the applicants.







